is the plain word for awakening, the coming-to-understand the Zen records set against delusion. Blyth carries it through his prose as the untranslated Japanese sound “satori”, the enlightenment-word left in Japanese where the dictionary attests it in English.

The confrontation

R. H. Blyth

everyone's satori is supposed to be (more or less) the same

Zen and Zen Classics, Volume 2: A History of Zen, Hokuseido Press, Tokyo, 1964, p. 61

The canonical source

迷時師度,了自度

When deluded, the master delivers you; once awakened, you deliver yourself.

the Platform Sutra, Huineng's parting words · ReadZen · T48n2008 0349b09

deluded master to deliver / ferry across awakened

The dictionary's band

Attested band verbatim from the dictionary entry 悟

  • awakening
  • to awaken
  • to realize

Entry Explanation (verbatim)

Awakening is the coming-to-understand that Zen records contrast with delusion and test by what changes in the awakened person's words and conduct.

Blyth knew better

Corroboration: the band is the entry's own, the word stays Japanese

The dictionary attests 悟 in English, awakening, to awaken, to realize, and the compounds carry the same reading, 大徹大悟 and 悟道 both englished as awakening. The sense is fully available to Blyth, who writes of enlightenment freely; what he does not do is render the word. He carries 悟 as the Japanese “satori” through the volume's prose, so the pivot-word of the whole tradition reaches the English reader as a Japanese term of art rather than the English one the dictionary attests.

The literal reading

悟 is the ordinary graph for waking up to how things are, the turn the records set against 迷, delusion. The Platform Sutra states it at the hinge of Huineng's story: 迷時師度,悟了自度, when deluded the master delivers you, once awakened you deliver yourself. The dictionary attests the word in English, awakening, and its compounds read the same way. It is a common verb, not a proper noun.

The alteration

Blyth does not mistranslate 悟; he declines to translate it. Throughout the history he keeps the awakening-word as the Japanese “satori,” a sound rather than the English the dictionary attests. Because 悟 is a Chinese graph with an attested English reading, the untranslated transliteration falls outside the band, the same move as “Mu” for 無 and “Kwatz!” for 喝. The cost is quiet but real: a reader learns to treat awakening as a special Japanese state, “satori,” set apart from the plain English coming-to-understand that the Chinese word actually names. The word that the whole book turns toward is the one word the book leaves in another language.